Buffer ETF Recap: $76B Channel Sees Strong October Inflows, FT Vest Leads Pack

Share

Macro Summary

The Buffer ETF channel now stands at $76.4 billion in total Assets Under Management (AUM) across 432 ETFs from 18 different issuers. For the past week, the category saw net flows of $159 million, contributing to a year-to-date total of $11.4 billion.

Over the past year, Buffer ETFs have attracted $13.9 billion in total flows. The growth trend continues, with 10 new ETFs launched in the last three months, indicating sustained product development and investor interest in the space.

Performance

Performance for Buffer ETFs remains highly idiosyncratic, driven entirely by the performance of their underlying asset class and the specific outcome period. This past week, funds linked to Digital Asset: Cryptocurrency – Bitcoin showed the strongest WTD returns at 3.89%, while funds tracking Commodity: Focused – Precious Metals were the weakest, with WTD returns of -2.00%.

For a detailed breakdown of individual fund performance, please consult the full, free performance report available in the right-side panel.

Flows

Equity-linked products continue to dominate the flow landscape, capturing the vast majority of new assets this past week. The October outcome period was the most active, seeing a surge of $227 million in net inflows. The top individual flow leader was GOCT, which alone gathered $76 million.

Flows by Asset Class

Asset Class # of Funds AUM WTD Flow 1M Flow 3M Flow YTD Flow 1Y Flow
Buffer – Commodity 1 $57M $0M ($12M) ($28M) ($13M) $10M
Buffer – Crypto 13 $184M $4M ($6M) ($99M) $150M $150M
Buffer – Equity 398 $75,598M $140M $669M $2,011M $11,047M $13,556M
Buffer – Fixed Income 2 $60M $11M $10M $22M $7M ($32M)
Buffer – Synthetic Income 18 $533M $3M $13M $82M $182M $184M

Flows by Implementation (Outcome Period)

Implementation WTD Flow 1M Flow 3M Flow YTD Flow 1Y Flow
Inflows
Buffer Reset: October $227M $848M $771M $372M $1,106M
Buffer Reset: Laddered $81M $230M $746M $2,359M $3,127M
Buffer Reset: September $12M $102M $1,442M $999M $857M
Outflows
Buffer Reset: February ($45M) ($127M) ($330M) $1,064M $842M
Buffer Reset: July ($42M) ($103M) $212M $1,015M $652M
Buffer Reset: January ($23M) ($85M) ($696M) $1,069M $746M

Individual Fund Flows (WTD)

Ticker Fund Name WTD Flow
Top 5 Inflows
GOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – October $76M
BUFR FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF $54M
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF – October $35M
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF – October $25M
QCOC FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF – October $22M
Top 5 Outflows
IBUF Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF – Quarterly ($35M)
GFEB FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF February ($31M)
CPRJ Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF July ($29M)
GMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – March ($13M)
SEPW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Sep ETF ($8M)

League Tables

The competitive landscape remains a two-issuer race. FT Vest leads in total AUM with $37.4 billion and also led weekly flows, pulling in $194 million. Innovator holds the second spot with $28.6 billion in AUM but experienced modest weekly outflows of ($23 million).

Top 5 Issuers by AUM

Issuer # of ETFs AUM Market Share
FT Vest 113 $37.43B 48.97%
Innovator 149 $28.63B 37.45%
Allianz 49 $4.90B 6.40%
AB Funds 3 $1.26B 1.65%
Pacer 13 $1.18B 1.54%

Issuer Flows (WTD)

Issuer WTD Flow 1M Flow 3M Flow YTD Flow 1Y Flow
Inflows
FT Vest $194M $397M $1.06B $4.26B $5.50B
PGIM $10M $31M $0.11B $0.28B $0.35B
AB Funds $7M $15M $0.06B $0.48B $0.52B
Outflows
Calamos ($27M) ($30M) ($0.11B) $0.24B $0.32B
Innovator ($23M) $152M $0.65B $4.52B $5.32B
Other ($6M) $17M $0.04B $0.24B $0.24B

Explore the data behind the insights. This weekly recap is just the start. Access the complete, in-depth reports for FREE in the right side panel to analyze performance, track flows, and view the latest league tables.

Disclosures

This material is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. All investments, including ETFs, involve risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investors should consider their investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing.

This analysis was developed by the team at ETF Action. We leverage advanced AI tools to assist in the drafting and refinement of our content, based on our expert prompts, direction, and final review.